Thoughts on the MLB Playoffs

Abbott: Well Costello, I’m going to New York with you. You know Bucky Harris, the Yankee’s manager, gave me a job as coach for as long as you’re on the team.

Costello: Look Abbott, if you’re the coach, you must know all the players.

Abbott: I certainly do.

Costello: Well you know I’ve never met the guys. So you’ll have to tell me their names, and then I’ll know who’s playing on the team.

Abbott: Oh, I’ll tell you their names, but you know it seems to me they give these ball players now-a-days very peculiar names.

Costello: You mean funny names?

Abbott: Strange names, pet names… like… Well, let’s see: we have on the bags, Who’s on first, What’s on second, I Don’t Know is on third…

Costello: That’s what I want to find out.

Abbott: I say Who’s on first, What’s on second, I Don’t Know’s on third.

Costello: Are you the manager?

Abbott: Yes.

Costello: You gonna be the coach too?

Abbott: Yes.

Costello: And you don’t know the fellows’ names?

Abbott: Well I should.

Costello: Well then who’s on first?

Abbott: Yes.

Costello: I mean the fellow’s name.

Abbott: Who.

Costello: The guy on first.

Abbott: Who.

Costello: The first baseman.

Abbott: Who.

Costello: The guy playing…

Abbott: Who is on first!

Costello: I’m asking YOU who’s on first.

Abbott: That’s the man’s name.

Costello: That’s who’s name?

Abbott: Yes.

Costello: Well go ahead and tell me.

Abbott: That’s it.

Costello: That’s who?

Abbott: Yes.

PAUSE

Costello: Look, you gotta first baseman?

Abbott: Certainly.

Costello: Who’s playing first?

Abbott: That’s right.

Costello: When you pay off the first baseman every month, who gets the money?

Abbott: Every dollar of it.

Costello: All I’m trying to find out is the fellow’s name on first base.

Abbott: Who.

Costello: The guy that gets…

Abbott: That’s it.

Costello: Who gets the money…

Abbott: He does, every dollar. Sometimes his wife comes down and collects it.

Costello: Whose wife?

Abbott: Yes.

PAUSE

Abbott: What’s wrong with that?

Costello: Look, all I wanna know is when you sign up the first baseman, how does he sign his name?

Abbott: Who.

Costello: The guy.

Abbott: Who.

Costello: How does he sign…

Abbott: That’s how he signs it.

Costello: Who?

Abbott: Yes.

PAUSE

Costello: All I’m trying to find out is what’s the guy’s name on first base.

Abbott: No. What is on second base.

Costello: I’m not asking you who’s on second.

Abbott: Who’s on first.

Costello: One base at a time!

Abbott: Well, don’t change the players around.

Costello: I’m not changing nobody!

Abbott: Take it easy, buddy.

Costello: I’m only asking you, who’s the guy on first base?

Abbott: That’s right.

Costello: Ok.

Abbott: All right.

PAUSE

Costello: What’s the guy’s name on first base?

Abbott: No. What is on second.

Costello: I’m not asking you who’s on second.

Abbott: Who’s on first.

Costello: I don’t know.

Abbott: He’s on third, we’re not talking about him.

Costello: Now how did I get on third base?

Abbott: Why you mentioned his name.

Costello: If I mentioned the third baseman’s name, who did I say is playing third?

Abbott: No. Who’s playing first.

Costello: What’s on first?

Abbott: What’s on second.

Costello: I don’t know.

Abbott: He’s on third.

Costello: There I go, back on third again!

PAUSE

Costello: Would you just stay on third base and don’t go off it.

Abbott: All right, what do you want to know?

Costello: Now who’s playing third base?

Abbott: Why do you insist on putting Who on third base?

Costello: What am I putting on third.

Abbott: No. What is on second.

Costello: You don’t want who on second?

Abbott: Who is on first.

Costello: I don’t know.

Abbott & Costello Together:Third base!

PAUSE

Costello: Look, you gotta outfield?

Abbott: Sure.

Costello: The left fielder’s name?

Abbott: Why.

Costello: I just thought I’d ask you.

Abbott: Well, I just thought I’d tell ya.

Costello: Then tell me who’s playing left field.

Abbott: Who’s playing first.

Costello: I’m not… stay out of the infield! I want to know what’s the guy’s name in left field?

Abbott: No, What is on second.

Costello: I’m not asking you who’s on second.

Abbott: Who’s on first!

Costello: I don’t know.

Abbott & Costello Together: Third base!

PAUSE

Costello: The left fielder’s name?

Abbott: Why.

Costello: Because!

Abbott: Oh, he’s centerfield.

PAUSE

Costello: Look, You gotta pitcher on this team?

Abbott: Sure.

Costello: The pitcher’s name?

Abbott: Tomorrow.

Costello: You don’t want to tell me today?

Abbott: I’m telling you now.

Costello: Then go ahead.

Abbott: Tomorrow!

Costello: What time?

Abbott: What time what?

Costello: What time tomorrow are you gonna tell me who’s pitching?

Abbott: Now listen. Who is not pitching.

Costello: I’ll break your arm, you say who’s on first! I want to know what’s the pitcher’s name?

Abbott: What’s on second.

Costello: I don’t know.

Abbott & Costello Together: Third base!

PAUSE

Costello: Gotta a catcher?

Abbott: Certainly.

Costello: The catcher’s name?

Abbott: Today.

Costello: Today, and tomorrow’s pitching.

Abbott: Now you’ve got it.

Costello: All we got is a couple of days on the team.

PAUSE

Costello: You know I’m a catcher too.

Abbott: So they tell me.

Costello: I get behind the plate to do some fancy catching, Tomorrow’s pitching on my team and a heavy hitter gets up. Now the heavy hitter bunts the ball. When he bunts the ball, me, being a good catcher, I’m gonna throw the guy out at first base. So I pick up the ball and throw it to who?

Abbott: Now that’s the first thing you’ve said right.

Costello: I don’t even know what I’m talking about!

PAUSE

Abbott: That’s all you have to do.

Costello: Is to throw the ball to first base.

Abbott: Yes!

Costello: Now who’s got it?

Abbott: Naturally.

PAUSE

Costello: Look, if I throw the ball to first base, somebody’s gotta get it. Now who has it?

Abbott: Naturally.

Costello: Who?

Abbott: Naturally.

Costello: Naturally?

Abbott: Naturally.

Costello: So I pick up the ball and I throw it to Naturally.

Abbott: No you don’t, you throw the ball to Who.

Costello: Naturally.

Abbott: That’s different.

Costello: That’s what I said.

Abbott: You’re not saying it…

Costello: I throw the ball to Naturally.

Abbott: You throw it to Who.

Costello: Naturally.

Abbott: That’s it.

Costello: That’s what I said!

Abbott: You ask me.

Costello: I throw the ball to who?

Abbott: Naturally.

Costello: Now you ask me.

Abbott: You throw the ball to Who?

Costello: Naturally.

Abbott: That’s it.

Costello: Same as you! Same as YOU! I throw the ball to who. Whoever it is drops the ball and the guy runs to second. Who picks up the ball and throws it to What. What throws it to I Don’t Know. I Don’t Know throws it back to Tomorrow, Triple play. Another guy gets up and hits a long fly ball to Because. Why? I don’t know! He’s on third and I don’t give a darn!

Abbott: What?

Costello: I said I don’t give a darn!

Abbott: Oh, that’s our shortstop.

Culture Corner: A new trend called “Armed Robbery” is sweeping the internet

The latest internet trend has begun to sweep the nation with hundreds of teens across the country rushing out to film themselves in hopes of reaching YouTube stardom. Following the spread of similar trends like “planking,” “owling,” and “batmanning,” this new fad, which is known as “armed robbery,” has come under fire by those who allege that it is dangerous to all involved.

In a lot of ways, the trend is simply a new offshoot of “planking.” To participate, two teenagers enter any place of business. Then, one of them films while the other draws a weapon and demands that the cashier empty the register. Once they have the money, the kids run away and upload the video to YouTube so everyone can view and comment on it.

Detractors from the trend say that “armed robbery” is dangerous, and caution everyone against participating in it. But fans of the trend dismiss these claims.

Bill Montgomery has uploaded over fifteen videos of himself armed robbing under his YouTube username, “Robba4Eva.” Bill says, “Everyone who’s losing their minds right now clearly just doesn’t get the internet. Armed robbery is all about fun and community, and about using the internet to form social connections with other people. Sure, doing armed robbery could be dangerous, but as long as you’re careful and all of the bystanders keep quiet, everything will be OK.”

Michael Kohrs is a new-media expert and clinical psychologist. He has been studying the people who participate in trends like this and has found that, “The people who engage in armed robbery, much like the people who plank, don’t do it for the money or even the rush of shoving a gun in someone’s face… they do it for fun and for the social interaction they get from the internet. Who could argue against that?”

Several parents’ groups have come out against armed robbery in recent weeks. The website for “Parents Against Internet Mayhem” contains the story of Michelle Neals. Neals says that her daughter was injured while armed robbing a McDonald’s near their home in Kentucky. “She had done the robbery just fine, but then on the way out, she tripped on a parking barrier and broke her ankle. It was absolutely traumatic for her,” said Neals.

This story seems unlikely to deter many people from armed robbery.
The Slant spoke to one teenager from Belle Meade who said he loved to do armed robbery with his friends every weekend. He tells us, “It’s just a fun thing to do… not just while we’re stealing the money, but then later, when we get together and post the video online, and we get to see the reactions from everyone on YouTube, we love it.”

When told about Michelle Neals’ story, the same teenager simply replied, “Well, I guess anything can be dangerous if you do it wrong. I don’t think it says anything about armed robbery as much as it says something about this one girl.”

While kids seem to be universally in favor of armed robbery, many adults are baffled by the growth of the fad.

John McCain, AARP member and senator from Arizona, said in an interview, “Jesus Christ, what are these kids doing these days? I mean, if someone walked up to you and just said ‘go lie down on the ground over there’ or ‘go rob that store,’ you’d say no. But if he’s got a camera and says he’ll upload it onto the internet, all of a sudden anything goes!”

VUPD Dispatched to Frat Row to Deal with ‘Beer Emergency’

The Greek scene at Vanderbilt took a huge hit this weekend when kegs came up dry and cases ended up empty. As we all know, the Greek scene relies on the alcohol to fuel their ragers as well as a lubricant for the females’ clothing. When the alcohol ran out this weekend the parties came to an all-too-sober halt, as did the guys’ chances of getting laid. On a side note condom sales were at an all-time low this Saturday and Vanderbilt reported an estimated loss of three thousand dollars on the night.
The fraternities did the only sane thing they could after finding their alcohol was gone: they called the police. Maybe these noble souls could help them locate some more booze. The police were baffled by the crime, but were so emotionally charged by these crying fraternity brothers that they pooled together their spare change and were able to raise over fifty dollars allowing the fraternities to purchase over 10,000 Natty Lights.
This selfless act by the Vanderbilt police has been gaining attention throughout the country and has even reached president Barack Obama’s ear; Obama was quoted as saying, “The Vanderbilt police officers came upon a scene that many of us could not imagine. These brave men and women, instead of running scared after witnessing an unspeakable atrocity, went above the call of duty. In a true act of generosity they used their own beer money to help these down and out students.” The President went on to invite the entire VUPD for a beer at the White House, which seems to be his go to celebration for a job well done.
The fraternity that was helped out the most by this act of kindness was Beta Rho Omega and their president Keith Stone. Mr. Stone contacted us so he could weigh in on the emotional roller coaster that he and all of his brothers rode this weekend. “ Dudes, I know we have all had issues with the VUPD in the past but this weekend was an eye opener for all of us. The VUPD truly does have our best interest in mind. I used to think it was just their saying but now after we’ve shared 10 or 20 brews together I see that they are bros, just like us.”
When asked for comment on the incident, Chancellor Nick Zeppos said, “Here at Vanderbilt, we are very proud of our fraternity system. It provides us with a campus culture that is unique among the elite institutions of higher learning in this country, and large amounts of cheap beer are a big part of that.” Zeppos went on to remind students that the VUPD are on the students side, “We have always said that the VUPD is in place for the safety and well-being of the Vanderbilt community. It’s the Metro police that are the dicks.”
Frat brothers were seen crying when they ran out of beer, and freshman students were at a loss when none of them had the ability to procure alcohol for themselves. However, the ones who took it the hardest were the Evangelical Christians who returned to make a sequel to their first hit. They were at a loss when searching for drunkards to yell at; they thought they had taken a wrong turn and ended up at Belmont instead.

From the Editor 9/29: Defining Humor

The Oxford English Dictionary tells us that humor is “That quality of action, speech, or writing, which excites amusement; oddity, jocularity, facetiousness, comicality, fun.” Alternatively, the Oxford English Dictionary says that humor could be used to mean “The faculty of perceiving what is ludicrous or amusing, or of expressing it in speech, writing, or other composition; jocose imagination or treatment of a subject.”
The Oxford English Dictionary goes on to say that the word humor is often used as a noun but that it can be used as a verb. When used as a verb, the Oxford English Dictionary posits that humor means “To comply with the humour of; to soothe or gratify by compliance; to indulge.” This definition is of course strictly transitive.
When the verb is used in a more figurative sense, the Oxford English Dictionary says that the word means “To comply with the peculiar nature or exigencies of (something); to adapt or accommodate oneself to; to act in compliance or agreement with; to fit, suit (with something)”
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the word ‘humor’ comes to us from the ancient Latin ‘humorem,’ which appears in other romance languages in similar forms. The closest form to our English ‘humor’ is the Anglo-Norman “(h)umor.”
In Middle English, the word was spelled “Umour,” or sometimes “Umor” (Again, according to the Oxford English Dictionary).
The Oxford English Dictionary also says that one of the earliest English uses of the word ‘humor’ comes from the book Humerous Dayes Mirth by George Chapman, when the author says “The skie hangs full of humour, and I thinke we shall haue raine.”
The word humor had different connotations back during the Middle Ages. For example, the Oxford English Dictionary tells us that in the fourteenth century humor meant “Any fluid or juice of an animal or plant, either natural or morbid.” At this time, the OED says, physicians believed there were four humors in the body, “blood, phlegm, choler, and melancholy or black choler.”
The Oxford English Dictionary asserts that the word humor is often spelled ‘humour’ in the United Kingdom, but that American writers usually spell it ‘humor.’ The Oxford English Dictionary does not assert that either of the spellings is correct, as this is not the Oxford English Dictionary’s job.
The Oxford English Dictionary maintains that there are two possible pronunciations of humor, hjumo(r) and jumi(r). The Oxford English Dictionary says that the H found in humor is pronounced the same as the h in the words ‘hot’ and ‘inhale.’
The Oxford English Dictionary also says that the pronunciation of this ‘h’ is a relatively recent development, and that many people choose not to pronounce it, especially in the UK.

Drunkard enters kingdom of Heaven

Despite having drunk beer socially during a large part of his life, Robert Mackey entered the Kingdom of Heaven approximately ten minutes after his death late Tuesday night.

This news came as a shock to thousands of potential Heaven-enterers here on earth. Kevin Lovell of cheepmissiontrips.com said he had to do a double take after learning about Mackey’s fate.
“I had seen [Mr. Mackey] drinking a beer with some of his friends a couple of years ago, so I assumed that he was on his way to hell. When I heard that he had gotten in to heaven, I thought that God must have made some mistake. How can someone be both righteous, and social?”

Mackey’s family seem to be the only people who weren’t surprised when they got the good news of Robert’s entrance into Heaven.
Mackey’s daughter Katherine told reporters “I knew that my father occasionally drank beer, sometimes even at parties. But I also knew that he was a good man who went to church every Sunday and even volunteered at the soup kitchen a couple of times a week, so I knew he was going to get into heaven.”

When asked why she felt that so many people were surprised at her Father’s afterlife situation, Katherine replied “I don’t know. I feel everyone who knew him, or even anyone who had ever put any effort into a conversation with him, or even anyone who ever judged him based on any meaningful criteria would have known what a good man he was.”

Despite the claims of his family members, several biblical scholars have come forward to argue against Mackey’s entrance into heaven. Betsy McMillian, a biblical scholar at Pensacola University, penned a scathing op-ed piece for the Pensacola Times where she states: “In the story of the drunkeness of Noah we clearly see that God does not want human beings to consume alcohol. I for one am shocked and disappointed in God for so blatantly abandoning his principles.”

In another article in the New York Times, Jesus Christ, a Jewish carpenter rebutted McMillian saying “With all due respect to miss McMillian, if you read the rest of the Bible you’ll notice that our main point is the importance of showing love to your fellow man. And Mr. Mackey certainly did lead a life of love.”

Kingdom of Heaven proprietor God defended his judgment in a press conference yesterday “If you really look at Mr. Mackey’s life… he loved his family, he worked hard to put all three of his children through college, and he never murdered, raped or even assaulted anyone. If you don’t think this man was heaven material, then I don’t know what to do with you.”

God went on to say that “If I only ever let people in to Heaven who had never drank, then this place would be nearly empty.”

This controversy comes on the heels of the infamous Ellen gaff, when God told reporters from People magazine that despite her lesbianism, Ellen Degeneris would “Absolutely be going to heaven after she dies.”

My Morning Jacket to headline Quake

Quake Headliners

It was a quiet Sunday night on campus. The bar of frattiness had been raised again by the weekend’s shenanigans, which is apparently so high our souls need saving. As soon as the play hard was over, the work hard began, or so it seemed. But then, at 11:53:49 CDT, all the hell we raised came back to haunt us.

Vanderbilt Programming Board announced the headliners for this year’s Commodore Quake. In three little words, our hope for the most fantastically fratty homecoming concert ever was smashed. More smashed than your Mom was on Saturday, kind of smashed.
What three words could crush our student body’s soul? President Michelle Bachman? Grin’s Shuts Down? You’re cut off? I’m sorry to say, dear readers, it was much worse.

My Morning Jacket.

Yes, My Morning Jacket is headlining the homecoming concert. Years from now we’ll remember where we were when we heard the news. Many of you found out by reading your facebook mini-feed, much like myself. “Out of all the amazing choices that were available, somehow, VPB has decided to go with My Morning Jacket for Quake. Lets just hope an additional concert is in the works a la HOV. Otherwise it would be a seriously disappointing Quake,” said a passive aggressive frat boy. Mass confusion swept over the vander-bubble, and barfed on facebook. “My morning jacket? Um, I wear my jacket all day,” said some idiot from my VUcept group.

God to Release Second Novel

God, creator of the universe and celebrated author of international best-seller “The Bible” has finally broken his 2000 year hiatus. The deity’s agent announced that God’s second book will be released later this summer.
The book, which is entitled “Lowlights from the city of a thousand memories.” represents a break from God’s previous work creating Holy Scripture. Instead of trying to stick within this genre God’s new book will be a thrilling detective story.
According to Tim Dalmers, The Slant’s literary critic, this move shows how God fears being labeled as ‘That guy who creates Holy Writ.’ Says Dalmers “God is really going out of his way here to show us his versatility as a writer. We all know that God can create great ancient scriptures and that he can make matter from non-matter, but with this book we’ll be able to see something totally new from God.”
Sample chapters of the book have already been released to several prominent critics so far the reviews have been mixed.
William Cunningham, The New Yorker’s head critic took a look at the book and says that “This sophomore effort from the Lord of all creation gets too stuck in existing cliches of the genre without adding anything new. As a reader I’m forced to wonder whether I would even care about this work if it hadn’t been written by God. The answer, sadly, is no.”
But other readers seem to see some potential in the work. Vanderbilt Professor Mike Blake had a chance to read some of Lowlights already. “Is it another Bible? Of course not! But it would be insane of us to expect God to top the runaway success of his first novel. The fact is that while this book isn’t groundbreaking, it is solid… And at the end of the day seeing God get back in to the game is important.”
Despite the critics, fans of God are already inundating booksellers with orders. Pope Benedict XVI, the leader of the Catholic church and a self-described “God fanatic since day one,” has already put in an order at his local Barnes and Noble. “Oh yeah, I’m super psyched for this book, I’ve been telling all my friends that they need to get it, and I’ve even pre-emptively put it on the fast track to add it to my Church’s cannon of sacred scripture.”

From the Editor- Thoughts on Liberty

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. –Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.
He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.
He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature.
He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:
For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:
For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing taxes on us without our consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:
For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:
For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:
For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:
For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.
We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

Don’t forget to come out to the very first Slant meeting of the year!

Hey there everyone, don’t forget that the first Slant meeting of the year will be held this Sunday at 8:30 PM in Sarratt 130. Be there and make sure you bring your funny!

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=103391299766226

From The Editor

Hey guys, I didn’t really have time to write a “From the Editor” for this issue, so you should really just move on to some other section.
Seriously, there’s nothing here. I was super busy this past week and I didn’t have time to write anything to put here. Stop reading now.
I promise you, there is nothing to read here. I’ll admit that it’s my fault I didn’t have time to get this done. But I had to go to Washington, D.C., this weekend to celebrate Easter with my family. I mean I guess I didn’t ‘have’ to do that, but I really wanted to go. I mean, come on, I haven’t seen my family since the semester started! What, you think the “From the Editor” column is more important than my family? Well of course you would say that, you’re not a member of my family.
But seriously, I’ve got nothing here. Just stop reading. Stop. Now. I assure you, there will be no reward for finishing this column.
You know that part of “Fight Club” where they start Project Mayhem and in order to join you need to stand outside the door for three days while Brad Pitt tells you that you can’t join? Well, this isn’t like that at all. I swear on all that is holy there is nothing in this column.
What the hell, bro? Why are you still here? There are so many better stories in this issue. Did you see that thing on page 3 about the Bon Jovi songs? It’s really funny; go read that instead of this. There isn’t anything here.
Christ in heaven, what am I going to have to do to convince you to stop reading this section? Maybe you’ll go away if I just stop typing right now.
DAMMIT YOU’RE STILL HERE.
As a matter of fact, if you won’t respect my authority as EIC, then you don’t deserve to be reading this publication. Put this copy back in the nearest Slant distribution thingy so it can go to someone who will actually listen to me.
I know what you’re thinking. You’re betting that at some point I’ll quit telling you to stop reading and then I’ll say something really profound. And then you can go talk to all of your friends and be like “Oh yeah, you need to read to the end of the ‘From the Editor,’ he says something really cool in the last paragraph.”
Well the joke’s on you! There is nothing profound in the last paragraph of this column. Do you know how I know that? Because this is the last paragraph of the column.