God on Tebow / Football

By: God.

Tim Tebow can be a starting quarterback in the NFL. In fact, Tim can do anything he sets his mind to.

It is rare enough that I find such devotion as his in any of my children, much less among professional athletes.

But Tim is special; anyone who has watched him pray knows this. It was my Divine Will that he should lead his team to the Super Bowl and come away victorious.

I believe in free will for my people, however. It was Tim’s own choices that led to his eventual downfall this season. It was not I who told him to throw so many balls so incredibly poorly during his start against the Patriots, nor was it my hand that struck the ball from his when he fumbled the ball back to Tom Brady.

Obviously, I do take some matters into my own hands. For instance, Ben Roethlisberger is quite the sinner and scumbag. I did not want to grace him with another Super Bowl appearance. And in regard to the Saints, even were they aptly named, there is no way in Hell I was going through another entire year of “Who ‘Dat.”

Many people seem to confuse “omniscient” and “perfect.” I am the former; not the latter. Tom Brady has never been the favorite of my children, and when he smote Tim’s playoff chances, I will admit that I lost my temper.

Yes, it was I who blew on Ahmad Bradshaw to make him fall into the endzone in the fourth quarter. I knew that, despite the talents Tom Brady was given by me, there would be no comeback for him in this game. You might say I did not have faith in him.

Tim was, and still is, my Chosen One. He will simply have to work more and pray harder in order to prove it next season. But, yes; Tim will come again.

Wordcount: 318

Coach Franklin Recruited

After one of the most successful football seasons recent history, Vanderbilt is seeking to increase the role of Coach James Franklin.
The university, looking to improve various teams on campus, has been courting Franklin primarily to coach Men’s Basketball, Women’s Swimming, and the student workers who operate the omelet stations at Rand Brunch.
Two years in a row now, Vanderbilt’s Men’s Basketball team has stirred up quite a bit of hype, only to lose to a lower-seeded team in the first round of the March tourney. While many students claim this trend is a “typical Vanderbilt athletic performance,” the administration has admitted disappointment and a desire to improve.
“At many universities, the goal of sporting events is to win,” reported Vanderbilt athletic director, Lance Legstrong. “We want to become one of those universities, and Coach Franklin seems the best hope to create a winning tradition.”
It seems the university’s motivations in regards to the Women’s Swim team are similar. Apparently, at the most recent swim meet, attendance dropped from its normal seven fans down to three, with seemingly no explanation for the drop. “If we could get more people to attend these meets, we may be able to afford to build a real pool on campus to make the program more attractive to prospective athletes,” claimed Legstrong. “I assume the location is the problem, at least. I have not actually attended a meet to confirm this.”
The issues surrounding the omelet operators, however, are entirely different and much more severe. When searching for commentators on the growing catastrophe, initial attempts proved futile. Finally, one student, who requested to remain anonymous, was found hunched over a toilet. “It’s not even food poisoning,” he said. “It just tasted fucking awful.”
Preliminary examinations appear that student workers with absolutely no knowledge about what an omelet is, much less how to make one, were hired this semester. While hopes for a full turn around are slim, Legstrong and the rest of the community hope that Franklin can at least creating a winning mindset and turn the program around, as he did with the Football team.
Franklin has yet to release his answer, but is expected to do so in charismatic fashion so that people can post his video repeatedly on Facebook.

377 Words

Student Health Center to Unveil “Miracle Drug”

On January 9th, Vanderbilt’s Zefross Student Health Center announced their plans to unveil, and start treating eligible students with, what they call a “miracle drug” by the name of Amoxicillin.
This drug, labeled as an “anti-biotic” by the medical community, is a pioneer of a new wave of infection-fighting medicines. One of its core components is recently discovered “Penicillin,” which has shown to be effective in combating illness.
Just over a year ago, I reported on Zerfoss’ then-looming sponsorship by the big-time medical giant, Mucinex. This merger never came to fruition, however, as Mucinex executives and medical staff at the Zerfoss SHC (supported by other global researchers in the field) determined that Mucinex, according to one medical journal, “Did absolutely nothing.”
Zerfoss broke up the would-be partnership with a twinge of embarrassment. Chief of Staff, Jack Jackson, released a statement at the time saying, “Hindsight being 20-20, we at Zerfoss realize that our overwhelming faith in a medicine with the sole purpose of clearing congestion, an effect one can find in numerous other drugs that also have other benefits, was misplaced. We vow to vastly improve our medical treatment to students and the Vanderbilt community at large.”
Students may still receive Mucinex for various symptoms such as stomach aches and sprained ankles, but the doctors at the Health Center are now assaulting the serious illnesses with Amoxicillin. Maladies such as sinus infections now have an enemy in this drug, as it actually has the potential to kill off bacteria.
“This announcement pleased me,” stated local Nashville doctor George Castle M.D. “It’s nice to see Vanderbilt’s student care leap into the 20th century.”
Of course, there are mixed opinions about the touted “miracle drug.” Doctor Garcia, from the medical journal MedNowNotLater, criticized Amoxicillin saying, “It may fend off infections, but then again, it may not. The problem with Amoxicillin is that it is a very weak drug, and there is absolutely no reason to prescribe it if a doctor knows the specific issues of a patient.”
Nevertheless, the staff at Zerfoss are excited. “We now treat with real medicine,” said Nurse Pride. “Even though there is a 60% chance or higher the Amoxicillin won’t rid your infection, it will make you feel better for its 3/day for ten days course before your relapse and return.”

Emily Dickinson to Receive Award.

Emily Dickinson to receive Currently Nameless Award

Emily Dickinson, the famous female, American poet, has been announced to the recipient of The Slant’s most prestigious accolade at this year’s Slant Awards, the I Need A Name For This Award Still.

Every year, The Slant rents out a posh restaurant and hands out praise and honors to various contributors for their demonstrations of excellence, with the winner of The Still Unnamed Award traditionally giving a speech. Executives at The Slant recently revealed that this year, the award and podium belong to Miss Emily Dickinson.

While Dickinson has not submitted many stories in recent issues, she was crucial in the actual creation of The Slant itself. And until now, that fact has gone undecorated.

The Slant made its debut in 1886, but there was a great deal of work involved in the years leading up to the printing of the first issue. The staff then had to compose many stories ahead of time, production times and dates had to be schedules around the lacking technology of the late 19th century, and the blossoming editorial needed a name.

Dickinson’s role in these endeavors was pivotal.

When The Slant was floundering for creative purpose in the early (18)70s, it was Dickinson who put the founders back on track when she wrote her “Poem 1263.” This poem, for those ignorant, begins, “Tell all the truth but tell it slant.” And that was what our former editors needed to hear.

Dickinson also provided many articles that would become some of the first material to be published in The Slant. She wrote a scathing satire on the ineptitude of the transportation systems of her time with, “Because I could not stop for Death –…” in “Poem 480.” She chided the sorostitues of her time, so focused on image even back then, with her words “I died for Beauty – but was scarce…” in “Poem 448,” and even did a parody of The Slant itself with “Publication – is the Auction…” in “Poem 788.”

Great success does not come without great jealousy, however. “Why not ward someone who actually is a part of The Slant,” said new sophomore writer, Liz Browning, when hearing the announcement. While it is true that Dickinson’s name may not have appeared on any masthead to date, it is important to look past the words on the page and into the substance behind the content – a goal of the Slant in itself.

“Dickinson DIED in 1886, the year this thing started, not to mention she was a shut in,” argued ignorant English Major Thomas Stoppard. This may be so, but is it not also true that Dickinson is said to live on through her works?

The Slant and her staff recognize what Dickinson has done; critics will be critics, but they are not going to dissuade this award from reaching its proper owner.

Miss Dickinson was not available for comment in regards to the announcement.

[Obviously I still need a name for the award.]

Emily Dickinson to be Added to List of Slant Alumni

Emily Dickinson to be Added to List of Slant Alumni
By: Alec Jordan

Famous 19th century poet Emily Dickinson is finally being recognized for her contributions to The Slant.
The Slant, this very publication, has achieved many great things since its debut in 1886. Arguably the most notable among The Slant’s credentials, however, is its long list of famous contributors.
Readers today may be familiar with some of the modern celebrities to make appearances within its pages, such as Billy Collins or Charlie Sheen, but some of the names from the past have slipped away with the time. Whether it be Oscar Wilde, who is responsible for a great deal of content around the turn of the 20th century, or even contributors from the last few decades such as Bill Clinton or George W. Bush, escape public notice for their value to this publication.

The Slant realized this, and promptly began an endeavor to restore the rich history of the paper to the minds of the readers – and what better place to start than at the beginning, with Emily Dickinson?
“Why not start with someone who actually was a part of The Slant,” said sophomore reader Liz Browning, when hearing the announcement. Her statement, innocent in nature, shocked The Slant’s more informed members – the state of The Slant’s history has fallen behind such a veil, readers are forgetting even the greatest of predecessors.

The Slant encountered more difficulty when trying to reeducate the public. “Dickinson DIED in 1886, not to mention she was a shut in,” explained ignorant English Major Thomas Stoppard. Despite lacking relevant information in regards to The Slant’s creation, it seemed that Stoppard had stumbled onto an issue that was sure to confound much of the public.

Thus, the Slant History Campaign (SHC) revamped its effort with much more fervor. They educated the public on the years of preparation that took place before The Slant was officially in action. They informed the people on the process of drafting many issues ahead of time before releasing the first (information flow was still slow back in those days, so no one really noticed). And they let people know that Dickinson was still a huge force, even when she sequestered herself to her house.

In fact, she is even responsible for our name. When The Slant was floundering for creative purpose in the early 70s, it was Dickinson who put the founders back on track when she wrote her “Poem 1263.” This poem, for those ignorant, begins, “Tell all the truth but tell it slant.” And that was what our former editors needed to hear.

In the years leading up to The Slant’s first publication, Dickinson provided many other pieces. She wrote a scathing satire on the ineptitude of the railway system of her time with, “Because I could not stop for Death –…” in “Poem 480.” She chided the soristutes of her time, so focused on image even back then, with her words “I died for Beauty – but was scarce…” in “Poem 448” and even did a parody of The Slant itself with “Publication – is the Auction…” in “Poem 788.”

Finally, Dickinson is getting her due, and the hard workers at The Slant could not be more pleased. From here, The Slant plans to continue tracing its history and giving praise and recognition to the other forgotten names along the way. “There’s a certain Slant of light.”

[Wrote this in one go; obviously needs some work but I'm not sure where to start.]

Point: Get this 3D out of my Movies!

When I go to the cinema, my goal is to view a movie. I don’t plan on being thrust into the action, nor do I expect to jump in my seat as my childhood is literally thrown in my face.
Yeah, that’s right – The Lion King 3D, and all 3D at that, is a completely insane idea.
What does it say about us as a society that we are no longer content to VIEW engaging, dramatic SCENES without some degree of boredom? It is pathetic.
Movies are art; 3D movies are like watercolor Monets designed for the lowest common denominator. Redesigning classics like The Lion King into 3D for a quick buck and cheap satisfaction is a slap in the face to anyone who values the integrity of the original masterpieces.
Soon, we will be further insulted when even subpar movies are reincarnated into 3D. Just imagine; it will only be a matter of time until The Lion King 2: Simba’s Pride is rereleased in 3D, and we, as a consumer base with rapidly declining standards, will probably flock to see it, despite knowing what a flop it was the first time.
Need more proof? Consider some of your favorite movies from over the years. Star Wars, for instance, because everyone loves Star Wars. Right now, we have people complaining that the remastered versions of Episodes IV – VI are losing integrity just because of modernized graphics on lightsaber clashes, lasers from ships, etc. What would happen if they tried to implement 3D, with Star Destroyers flying out at the audience and so forth? The franchise would collapse under all the criticism.
People may say they are pro-3D, but when it actually affects something they care about, they realize how it could actually ruin everything loved about cinema and the movie theatre.
The thought sickens me, just as watching films jump off the screen at me does. You can keep your hypothetical profits and silly-colored glasses; I will not be going to see any 3D movies.

Point: California Gurls: They’re Unforgettable.

I’ve known a California gurl before; I knew her for three years and four months and it was the best time of my life. Then it ended.
I didn’t forget her for the two weeks I spent lying in bed crying myself to sleep afterwards, though, and I haven’t forgotten how much of a bitch California gurls can be. They wear you down, weave their way into your life, then leave you stranded. You don’t forget that type of emotial destruction.
Aside from that, California has tons of other unforgettable gurls. Maria Shriver is a pretty awesome chick, having been married to Arnold, and being a political entity herself.
And Marilyn Monroe is the most quoted woman on Facebook. And she happens to be from Cali. Think anyone’s forgetting her any time soon? Doubtful.
Oh, and how about Buffy the Vampire Slayer? She actually inspired an entire television series based on how many times she saved the world. It would be plain stupid and rude of us to forget her sacrifices.
But none of them are heartbreakers like that other bitch. Every nght I remember how she hurt me and how much I hate her. I wish I could forget. But I can’t.
Call me jaded, but I know I’m right. I dare you to go to Cali, get your life stable, find your one true love, and have her leave you.
It’s pretty fucking awful.
You’ll hate your meaningless existence pretty much every day for as long as you live.
And you will definitely never, ever forget that awful, horrible, amazing California gurl.

Counter Point: Windows Over PC All Day, All the Time.

Why would you want to buy a PC when you have the option of purchasing a Windows computer instead? Answer: You wouldn’t. Now, I realize this may sound harsh, but it is nonetheless true. Let’s go through the factors, without bias, so that you can come to agree with me on your own.

First off, let’s look at the company itself. No, Windows isn’t a perfect company, but at the very least it realizes this. Yes, mistakes have been made in the past, such as the release of “Windows Vista.” But at the same time, they are willing to release “fixes” or “patches” for these mistakes, as evidenced when “Windows 7” was released to address the Vista debacle. Wouldn’t you rather be supported by a company that is willing to own up to its mistakes?

By the way, isn’t that “aero” theme in Windows 7 just marvelous? Aesthetics shouldn’t be overlooked! It looks so sleek. It looks so pretty. In short, it looks how a computer screen SHOULD look. It lets you do what you want to while looking nice, which bring us to functionality.

Microsoft Windows works. It’s that simple. For instance, the Start Menu. It’s fantastically designed. It can get you to virtually any place on your computer in just a few, simple clicks of the mouse, and it doesn’t take up half your screen in the process. And when taking about functionality, you have to mention Windows’ compatibility. Go and buy a computer game, then look at the specifications. It should say something like “For Windows… For Mac…” Where are the PC specs? Can PC even run computer games? It’s a tossup; don’t trust your luck. Also, feel like listening to some music? Open up Windows Media Player. How’s that PC Media Player? Oh that’s right, it’s non-existent.

I’d say “Good Game, PC,” if I knew you were capable of running it, but I don’t. So, shove off and make room for the real computers – those of the Windows persuasion.

Point: P/CP rulez

Alright, so I have a problem with the last two issues of The Slant. We’ve had no Point/Counterpoint articles. Why not, you ask? It’s because the editors are too lazy to think of clever topics and decide to find easier ways to fill up blank space. Those bitches!
This has to change. After all, what would The Slant be without the Point/Counterpoint? Just a bunch of words and no pictures with no big dash cutting through the middle of an article, that’s what! It is a completely necessary component of our periodical, and we would be dishonoring the venerable name of The Slant were we even to consider leaving it out for good. Point/Counterpoint is to The Slant what the Big Mac is to McDonald’s. It is tradition personified. To put it in perspective, let’s say you go to Paris to see the Eiffel Tower. Then you’re told it’s not there, because people thought ugly condos were a better way to fill the area. Well, for the non literarily inclined, in this metaphor Paris is The Slant, Point/Counterpoint is the Eiffel tower, and the French are smelly people who talk with funny accents even in their own language.
Yes, we may lavish the graphics on the page and space it specially so that it takes up a lot (a LOT) of space, but hey, it’s two articles in one! Two-for-one! All your friends love Two-for-one deals, DON’T YOU? Not to mention that the debates that take place in Point/Counterpoint articles are highly stimulating both for the brain and other parts of the body. Two people who clearly have NO IDEA who the other writer is square off around an issue and just go at it. There’s no script. There’s no planning; the two definitely don’t plan it out together. Where else are you going to find this time of exhilaration? Aside from huge theme parks, probably nowhere.
So I say to you, fellow Slant lovers, embrace the Point/Counterpoint. Want it. Want it some more. Voice your opinions on how much the Point/Counterpoint means to you, because there may never be a more legitimate way to take up space in the Slant again. Besides, assuming this gets published, I’ve already won.

Zerfoss Student Health Sponsored by Mucinex

Zerfoss Student Health Center: formerly a place students could go for relatively cheap and semi-efficient medical attention. Now, a place students can go to receive Mucinex.
It is unclear where these two forces met, but Zerfoss is now being sponsored by Mucinex, the OTC congestion medicine. In the deal, Mucinex agreed to fund the entire walk-in clinic plus 65% of all in-house tests, equipment maintenance, salaries, and medicinal purchases. This last bit is misleading, however, as the majority of the medicine purchased by the Student Health Center is actually Mucinex-D. Also, in this deal the establishment will be renamed. No official title has been chosen yet, but the leading contender seems to be “Mucinex Student Mucinex Center,” or “The Muce” for short, as executives have been unfortunately calling is.
Obviously, this has caused quite a stir in the student population. A&S freshman Rachel Frankerton told The Slant, “When I applied and decided to attend Vanderbilt, I thought I would be attending an institution that valued the well-being of its students. I’m honestly embarrassed for the administration due to its weakness towards corporate sponsorship.”
Junior John Johnston, a double major in electrical and biomedical engineering, countered with the point, “What? There are other buildings that aren’t Stevenson, Featheringill, or the Munchie Mart?”
Students are not the only ones with differing opinions about this development. Dr. Kelly Winslow, a physician at “The Muce,” announced, “I currently prescribe a course of Mucinex-D to every patient I see. It’s great stuff. It does things to your nose and mucus and has little to no correlation with subsequent drug addictions.”
Dr. William Bunch, a local EMT, disagrees. “Mucinex? That stuff just makes everything hurt more without any actual beneficial side effects. It does just enough to drain the nose but leaves it in your throat so that you cough extra hard and extra painfully and feel like you want to die. In my personal AND medical opinion, it is not a good substance to take for any reason.”
Nonetheless, Mucinex boxes are being tossed out left and right at “The Muce.” It is rumored that the next batch of flu shots will actually just be liquid Mucinex. The upstairs offices, which deal with psychiatric issues, are going to start “Mucinex-alternative” methods of treating depression, eating disorders, Schizophrenia, and other such problems. There is also an initiative that has been started to get the Purell dispensers around campus to simply dispense Mucinex-D capsules.

This article should not be read without food – also, the more liquid you drink while reading this article, the more effective it will be. Water and juice are recommended. Do not read this article more than twice in a twenty-four hour period. This article was brought to you and is sponsored by Mucinex.